Forum begins after the advertisement:
[Part 15] Adding level up to treasure chest & NullReferenceException
Home › Forums › Video Game Tutorial Series › Creating a Rogue-like Shoot-em Up in Unity › [Part 15] Adding level up to treasure chest & NullReferenceException
- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 months, 2 weeks ago by Nathan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 1, 2024 at 6:54 am #14443::
Hello, Near the end of part 15, the treasure chest script was updated and I wanted to add the ability to basically level up the player’s weapon or passives(if no evolution is available) by just calling StartLevelUp from the GameManager. After testing, I started getting a NullReferenceException.
View post on imgur.com
I then commented out the code I had added and placed a few Debug.log to check what is read and I noticed I get a NullReferenceException with the original script as well(my fault for forgetting to test). This happens when you attempt to pick up a chest without the ability to evolve, and it does not destroy the game object for some reason. I placed my current TreasureChest script below. Thank you.
View post on imgur.com
View post on imgur.com
May 2, 2024 at 3:19 pm #14474::Update 3 May 2024: Fixed an error in the code.
That’s partially an issue with the
OpenTreasureChest()
function. You can add a couple of extra checks to prevent the NullReferenceException. For the level up logic, you should put it after the foreach loop.public void OpenTreasureChest(PlayerInventory inventory, bool isHigherTier) { // Loop through every weapon to check whether it can evolve. foreach(PlayerInventory.Slot s in inventory.weaponSlots) { Weapon w = s.item as Weapon; if (!w || w.data == null || w.data.evolutionData == null) continue; // Ignore weapon if it cannot evolve. // Loop through every possible evolution of the weapon. foreach (ItemData.Evolution e in w.data.evolutionData) { // Only attempt to evolve weapons via treasure chest evolution. if (e.condition == ItemData.Evolution.Condition.treasureChest) { bool attempt = w.AttemptEvolution(e, 0); if (attempt) return; // If evolution suceeds, stop. } } } // Logic for your level up stuff goes here. }
Let me know if this works!
May 2, 2024 at 11:54 pm #14481::Question. Would it be better to use || rather than && when checking if null? Because if only one of the conditions are met, rather than all three, it would continue. I was having this issue yesterday where if the chest was picked up without a full inventory, I would get a NullReferenceException.
public void OpenTreasureChest(PlayerInventoy inventory, bool isHigherTier) { //loop through every weapon to check if it can evolve foreach (PlayerInventoy.Slot s in inventory.weaponSlots) { Weapon w = s.item as Weapon; //if s.item is a weapon, w will hold the weapon, otherwise it will return null if (w == null || w.data == null || w.data.evolutionData == null) { continue; // Ignore weapon if it cannot evolve } //loop through every possible evolution of the weapon foreach (ItemData.Evolution e in w.data.evolutionData) { //only attempt to evolve weapons by treasure chest if (e.condition == ItemData.Evolution.Condition.treasureChest) { Debug.Log(w.name + " | " + s.item + " | " + e.condition); bool attempt = w.AttemptEvolution(e, 0); //if evolution suceeds if (attempt) { return; } } } } //Open level up screen if weapon cannot evolve }
May 3, 2024 at 10:02 am #14486::Question. Would it be better to use || rather than && when checking if null? Because if only one of the conditions are met, rather than all three, it would continue. I was having this issue yesterday where if the chest was picked up without a full inventory, I would get a NullReferenceException.
Yup. It will be better. My bad — my logic was wrong. Using
||
is the right choice.May 3, 2024 at 10:35 am #14487::This works! I am working on the logic for implementing leveling up when picking up a chest if evolution is unavailable. I can post it when I have it working. Thank you.
May 8, 2024 at 12:59 am #14556::I added the logic for leveling up through chests if interested. It works for me and I haven’t found any issues through testing.
using System.Collections; using System.Collections.Generic; using UnityEngine; using static PlayerStats; public class TreasureChest : MonoBehaviour { void OnTriggerEnter2D(Collider2D c) { PlayerInventoy p = c.GetComponent<PlayerInventoy>(); //evolve weapon if (p) { bool randomBool = Random.Range(0, 2) == 0; OpenTreasureChest(p, randomBool); Destroy(gameObject); } } public void OpenTreasureChest(PlayerInventoy inventory, bool isHigherTier) { bool evolutionAttempted = false; // Flag to track if any evolution attempt was made PlayerStats ps = FindObjectOfType<PlayerStats>(); //loop through every weapon to check if it can evolve foreach (PlayerInventoy.Slot s in inventory.weaponSlots) { Weapon w = s.item as Weapon; //if s.item is a weapon, w will hold the weapon, otherwise it will return null if (w == null || w.data == null || w.data.evolutionData == null) { continue; // Ignore weapon if it cannot evolve } //loop through every possible evolution of the weapon foreach (ItemData.Evolution e in w.data.evolutionData) { //only attempt to evolve weapons by treasure chest if (e.condition == ItemData.Evolution.Condition.treasureChest) { Debug.Log(w.name + " | " + s.item + " | " + e.condition); bool attempt = w.AttemptEvolution(e, 0); //if evolution suceeds if (attempt) { evolutionAttempted = true; //set flag to true return; } } } } //Open level up screen if weapon cannot evolve if (ps != null && !evolutionAttempted) { ps.level++;//level up player ps.experience = 0; //Determine the players experience cap for the next level int experienceCapIncrease = 0; if (ps.levelRanges != null) { foreach (LevelRange range in ps.levelRanges) { if (ps.level >= range.startLevel && ps.level <= range.endLevel) { experienceCapIncrease = range.experienceCapIncrease; break; } } } ps.experienceCap += experienceCapIncrease; //increase the players experience cap for the next level ps.expBar.fillAmount = (float)ps.experience / ps.experienceCap;//update exp bar fill amount ps.UpdateLevelText(); GameManager.instance.StartLevelUp(); } } }
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Advertisement below: